N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
Module 3: Reflection Assignment Peer Review
Submit by 2359 (CT) Saturday of Module 3.
Name:
Date:
Overview: Peer Review
In the Module 3 Reflection Assignment, you will reflect upon what you have learned about the
Minor Incident Rule and Peer Review Committee processes as you consider the actions of
fictitious nurses and committee members in scenarios. REMEMBER, YOU ARE USING THE
TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING RULES, NOT THE STATE YOU LIVE IN. Please use the link
provided in the assignment for the Texas BON Rule 217.16.
Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment.
Performance Objectives:
Differentiate between the the Minor Incident Rule (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable Incident
(217.16 h)
Describe the due process protections (Rule 217.19) for a nurse who is peer-reviewed.
Rubric
Task
Part 1
Applying Rule 217.16 Minor vs.
Reportable Incident
35 points
Accomplished
Proficient
Correct conclusion with
4 professionally written
sentences
demonstrating critical
thinking (35 points)
Correct conclusion with
2 professionally written
sentences
demonstrating critical
thinking (25 points)
Correct conclusion with
3 professionally written
sentences
demonstrating critical
thinking (30 points)
N3375 Spring 2020
Needs Improvement
Incorrect conclusion OR 1
sentence (15 points)
Does not answer question
(0 points)
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
Part 2
Applying IBPR Rule 217.19 a (2)
Bad Faith
35 points
Response includes 4
professionally written
sentences
demonstrating critical
thinking (35 points)
Response includes 2
professionally written
sentences
demonstrating critical
thinking (25 points)
Response includes 3
professionally written
sentences
demonstrating critical
thinking (30 points)
Part 3
Multiple Choice questions
4 correct answers (20
points)
10 points
Does not answer question
(0 points)
3 correct answers (15
points)
1 correct answer (5 points)
0 correct answers (0 points)
2 correct answers (10
points)
20 points
Professional Writing
1 sentence (15 points)
Assignment is written
clearly without any
grammatical or spelling
errors.
(10 points)
Assignment contains 13 grammatical or
spelling errors.
Assignment contains 4 or greater
grammatical or spelling errors.
(0 points)
(5 points)
Part 1: Applying Rule 217.16
Lets review what deems a Minor Incident (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable incident- (217.16 h)A minor incident is- 217.16(a)- nurses actions may be a violation of a board rule, but does not
indicate the nurses continued practice poses a risk of harm to a patient or another person.
A reportable incident is- 217.16(h)- conduct that falls outside of the definition of a minor
incident and must be reported to a PRC or BON.
Lets come up with an easy way to remember what is a minor incident- in case you are ever in
this situation, whether this happens to you or you are participating on a peer review committee
evaluating a fellow nurses actions. Think about the word harp.
H- no significant Harm
A- nurse must take Accountability
R- easily Remediated
P- no Pattern of this behavior
However, these minor incidents still must be documented, tracked and remedied. The nurse must
be reported to the nursing peer review committee if a nurse commits five (5) minor incidents
within a 12-month period.
N3375 Spring 2020
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
Look at this case study scenario below.
Nurse Karen is caring for a newly admitted 67-year-old male patient with infectious
endocarditis due to a bacterial infection of his prosthetic heart valve. After blood cultures come
back positive for staphylococcus aureus, IV Vancomycin is ordered. He tells Nurse Karen and
the doctor that the last time he got this medication, he experienced hives and hot, itchy skin but
he was not allergic to it. The doctor ordered the medication to be infused slowly as to avoid Red
Man Syndrome (500 mg IV bag at a rate of two hours as opposed to the standard one
hour). Karen sets the IV pump incorrectly, and the infusion is given within a 30-minute
period. She calls the doctor and immediately gives 50 mg diphenhydramine and ranitidine 50
mg via IV with orders. The patient experienced mild flushing, but the episode resolved within 20
minutes. Karen is a well-seasoned nurse with over 20 years of experience and no prior history
of incidents. She took immediate responsibility for this error when meeting with the unit
manager. Karen will now need another RN to witness and sign when she administers IV
medication for the next 60 days. Karen agrees to this plan.”
Using the Texas BON Rule 217.16, review (a) a Minor Incident vs. (h) a reportable incident.
This information can be found at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-16.asp
Based on your assessment of the criteria, was this a Minor Incident or reportable event? Why or
Why not? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to
support your thoughts for full credit.
Minor or Reportable?
Why? Or Why not? Include examples from the Rule.
Part 2: Applying Rule 217.19 Incident-Based Peer Review
N3375 Spring 2020
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
First, review your learning about incident-based peer review. The purpose of an IBPR is to
determine whether a nurse should be reported to the Texas Board of Nursing (BON) for
professional misconduct or licensure violations based on one or more such events.
Please use the link provided at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-19.asp
to review. Apply the information to this case study”Nurse Sam is charting at the nurses station where there are co-workers, physicians and a unit
secretary gathered. Sam and the nurse manager have not been seeing eye to eye lately (verbal
altercations both in the halls and in the cafeteria recently). The nurse manager approaches Sam
and loudly states, I am glad you are here. Just to let you know, the Incident Based Peer Review
Committee is meeting tomorrow, and we are investigating your recent questionable behavior. I
know you have made many recent medication errors and safety violations noted by the Patient
Safety Committee. I also heard you are dating that patient who was in Room 256B last month. I
thought you would want to know this was happening, you could be in big trouble and probably
fired. I dont have anything official to give you, but you better find a lawyer, although I doubt
you can with this short notice.
How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR? Refer to the Rule listed below and
discuss in the text box.
Rule 217.19 a (2) Bad Faith- knowingly or recklessly acting without the supported of
reasonable or legal basis, misrepresenting the facts surrounding the facts under review, acting out
of malice or personal animosity towards the nurse, acting from a conflict of interest, or
knowingly or recklessly denying due process. How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR
based on this rule? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the
Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.
Part 3: Multiple Choice Questions
N3375 Spring 2020
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
Answer the following multiple-choice questions according to the Module 3 readings and
lectures. They are worth 5 points each, there is only 1 correct answer.
1). According to Clevette and colleagues, examples of unsafe, common disciplinary actions
reviewed by boards of nursing include all of the following EXCEPTa). Destruction or alteration of patient records, including fraudulent charting and/or signatures
and/or replacement of records with intent to mislead or deceive.
b). Physical patient abuse, such as when a nurse hits, strikes, or performs similar physical acts of
aggression involving patient contact.
c). Practicing beyond the authorized scope, such as administering medications without a
physicians order.
d). Failure to implement safeguards to ensure patient confidentiality and integrity of patients
protected health information, violating HIPPA.
2). Rule 217.19 in Texas, Incident Based Nursing Peer Review and Whistleblower Protections
provides to the nurse being peer reviewed EXCEPTa). Minimum protection
b). Minimum due process
c). Minimum legal representation
d). Minimum rights afforded to nurse
3). If a nurse does not agree to the discipline set due to a complaint made against this nurse, after
reviewing the proposed agreed order, they can request aa). Informal conference
b). Formal conference
c). Informal hearing
d). Formal hearing
4). Common nursing remedial education courses required if a nurse is being disciplined area). medication refresher, ethics, geriatric care, nursing jurisprudence, care coordination.
b). ethics course, care coordination, documentation, medication refresher.
c). physical assessment refresher, critical thinking, documentation, medication refresher, geriatric
care.
d). nursing jurisprudence, documentation, ethics, medication refresher, physical assessment
refresher and critical thinking.
Submit this Assignment Document into Canvas for grading.
N3375 Spring 2020
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
Module 3: Reflection Assignment Peer Review
Submit by 2359 (CT) Saturday of Module 3.
Name:
Date:
10/17/2020
Overview: Peer Review
In the Module 3 Reflection Assignment, you will reflect upon what you have learned about the
Minor Incident Rule and Peer Review Committee processes as you consider the actions of
fictitious nurses and committee members in scenarios. REMEMBER, YOU ARE USING THE
TEXAS BOARD OF NURSING RULES, NOT THE STATE YOU LIVE IN. Please use the link
provided in the assignment for the Texas BON Rule 217.16.
Refer to your course readings and lectures as you complete the assignment.
Performance Objectives:
? Differentiate between the the Minor Incident Rule (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable Incident
(217.16 h)
? Describe the due process protections (Rule 217.19) for a nurse who is peer-reviewed.
Rubric
Task
Part 1
Applying Rule 217.16
Minor vs. Reportable
Incident
35 points
Accomplished
Proficient
Needs Improvement
Correct
conclusion with 4
professionally
written sentences
demonstrating
critical thinking
(35 points)
Correct
conclusion with 2
professionally
written sentences
demonstrating
critical thinking
(25 points)
Incorrect conclusion OR
1 sentence (15 points)
Correct
conclusion with 3
professionally
written sentences
demonstrating
N3375 Spring 2020
This study source was downloaded by 100000782945284 from CourseHero.com on 03-12-2022 10:11:26 GMT -06:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/71966649/Module-3-peer-reviewdocx/
Does not answer
question
(0 points)
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
critical thinking
(30 points)
Part 2
Applying IBPR Rule
217.19 a (2) Bad Faith
35 points
Response
includes 4
professionally
written sentences
demonstrating
critical thinking
(35 points)
Response
includes 2
professionally
written sentences
demonstrating
critical thinking
(25 points)
Response
includes 3
professionally
written sentences
demonstrating
critical thinking
(30 points)
Part 3
Multiple Choice
questions
4 correct answers
(20 points)
20 points
Professional Writing
10 points
Assignment is
written clearly
without any
grammatical or
spelling errors.
1 sentence (15 points)
Does not answer
question
(0 points)
3 correct answers
(15 points)
1 correct answer (5
points)
2 correct answers
(10 points)
0 correct answers (0
points)
Assignment
contains 1-3
grammatical or
spelling errors.
Assignment contains 4
or greater grammatical
or spelling errors.
(0 points)
(5 points)
(10 points)
Part 1: Applying Rule 217.16
Lets review what deems a Minor Incident (217.16 a) vs. a Reportable incident- (217.16 h)A minor incident is- 217.16(a)- nurses actions may be a violation of a board rule, but does not
indicate the nurses continued practice poses a risk of harm to a patient or another person.
A reportable incident is- 217.16(h)- conduct that falls outside of the definition of a minor
incident and must be reported to a PRC or BON.
Lets come up with an easy way to remember what is a minor incident- in case you are ever in
this situation, whether this happens to you or you are participating on a peer review committee
evaluating a fellow nurses actions. Think about the word harp.
N3375 Spring 2020
This study source was downloaded by 100000782945284 from CourseHero.com on 03-12-2022 10:11:26 GMT -06:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/71966649/Module-3-peer-reviewdocx/
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
?
?
?
?
H- no significant Harm
A- nurse must take Accountability
R- easily Remediated
P- no Pattern of this behavior
However, these minor incidents still must be documented, tracked and remedied. The nurse must
be reported to the nursing peer review committee if a nurse commits five (5) minor incidents
within a 12-month period.
Look at this case study scenario below.
Nurse Karen is caring for a newly admitted 67-year-old male patient with infectious
endocarditis due to a bacterial infection of his prosthetic heart valve. After blood cultures come
back positive for staphylococcus aureus, IV Vancomycin is ordered. He tells Nurse Karen and
the doctor that the last time he got this medication, he experienced hives and hot, itchy skin but
he was not allergic to it. The doctor ordered the medication to be infused slowly as to avoid Red
Man Syndrome (500 mg IV bag at a rate of two hours as opposed to the standard one
hour). Karen sets the IV pump incorrectly, and the infusion is given within a 30-minute
period. She calls the doctor and immediately gives 50 mg diphenhydramine and ranitidine 50
mg via IV with orders. The patient experienced mild flushing, but the episode resolved within 20
minutes. Karen is a well-seasoned nurse with over 20 years of experience and no prior history
of incidents. She took immediate responsibility for this error when meeting with the unit
manager. Karen will now need another RN to witness and sign when she administers IV
medication for the next 60 days. Karen agrees to this plan.”
Using the Texas BON Rule 217.16, review (a) a Minor Incident vs. (h) a reportable incident. This
information can be found at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-16.asp
Based on your assessment of the criteria, was this a Minor Incident or reportable event? Why or
Why not? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the Rule to
support your thoughts for full credit.
Minor or Reportable?
This was a minor incident and was not something that needed to be reported to the
TBON at that time.
Why? Or Why not? Include examples from the Rule.
Its a minor offence because the rule clearly states a minor offence is something that the
nurses practice does not pose a risk of harm to the patient, and this case does not. The
N3375 Spring 2020
This study source was downloaded by 100000782945284 from CourseHero.com on 03-12-2022 10:11:26 GMT -06:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/71966649/Module-3-peer-reviewdocx/
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
nurse is a seasoned nurse, she had no prior offences, and took the proper immediate
steps to ensure patient safety. If the nurse continues to make mistakes of this nature
within the next 12 months, then it should be reported.
Part 2: Applying Rule 217.19 Incident-Based Peer Review
First, review your learning about incident-based peer review. The purpose of an IBPR is to
determine whether a nurse should be reported to the Texas Board of Nursing (BON) for
professional misconduct or licensure violations based on one or more such events.
Please use the link provided at https://www.bon.texas.gov/rr_current/217-19.asp
to review. Apply the information to this case study”Nurse Sam is charting at the nurses station where there are co-workers, physicians and a unit
secretary gathered. Sam and the nurse manager have not been seeing eye to eye lately (verbal
altercations both in the halls and in the cafeteria recently). The nurse manager approaches Sam
and loudly states, I am glad you are here. Just to let you know, the Incident Based Peer Review
Committee is meeting tomorrow, and we are investigating your recent questionable behavior. I
know you have made many recent medication errors and safety violations noted by the Patient
Safety Committee. I also heard you are dating that patient who was in Room 256B last month. I
thought you would want to know this was happening, you could be in big trouble and probably
fired. I dont have anything official to give you, but you better find a lawyer, although I doubt
you can with this short notice.
How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR? Refer to the Rule listed below and
discuss in the text box.
Rule 219.19 a (2) Bad Faith- knowingly or recklessly acting without the supported of
reasonable or legal basis, misrepresenting the facts surrounding the facts under review, acting out
of malice or personal animosity towards the nurse, acting from a conflict of interest, or
knowingly or recklessly denying due process. How did this nurse manager violate the IBPR
based on this rule? Please write four (4) professionally written sentences with examples from the
Rule to support your thoughts for full credit.
The manager violated several parts of the Rule 217.19. The first one being the Bad Faith, section
2, of the rule where the manager ran into the nurse recklessly, and acting without support of
N3375 Spring 2020
This study source was downloaded by 100000782945284 from CourseHero.com on 03-12-2022 10:11:26 GMT -06:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/71966649/Module-3-peer-reviewdocx/
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
legal basis. The manager also was interpreting possible facts that were under review, and had
personal animosity towards the nurse. The manager did not have written notice to give the nurse
and stated the nurse will not have time to obtain council. These are all violations of the Rule
219.19.
Part 3: Multiple Choice Questions
Answer the following multiple-choice questions according to the Module 3 readings and
lectures. They are worth 5 points each, there is only 1 correct answer.
1). According to Clevette and colleagues, examples of unsafe, common disciplinary actions
reviewed by boards of nursing include all of the following EXCEPT-D
a). Destruction or alteration of patient records, including fraudulent charting and/or signatures
and/or replacement of records with intent to mislead or deceive.
b). Physical patient abuse, such as when a nurse hits, strikes, or performs similar physical acts of
aggression involving patient contact.
c). Practicing beyond the authorized scope, such as administering medications without a
physicians order.
d). Failure to implement safeguards to ensure patient confidentiality and integrity of patients
protected health information, violating HIPPA.
2). Rule 217.19 in Texas, Incident Based Nursing Peer Review and Whistleblower Protections
provides to the nurse being peer reviewed EXCEPT- A
a). Minimum protection
b). Minimum due process
c). Minimum legal representation
d). Minimum rights afforded to nurse
3). If a nurse does not agree to the discipline set due to a complaint made against this nurse, after
reviewing the proposed agreed order, they can request a- A
a). Informal conference
b). Formal conference
c). Informal hearing
d). Formal hearing
N3375 Spring 2020
This study source was downloaded by 100000782945284 from CourseHero.com on 03-12-2022 10:11:26 GMT -06:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/71966649/Module-3-peer-reviewdocx/
N3375 Health Policy & Legal Aspects
4). Common nursing remedial education courses required if a nurse is being disciplined are- D
a). medication refresher, ethics, geriatric care, nursing jurisprudence, care coordination.
b). ethics course, care coordination, documentation, medication refresher.
c). physical assessment refresher, critical thinking, documentation, medication refresher, geriatric
care.
d). nursing jurisprudence, documentation, ethics, medication refresher, physical assessment
refresher and critical thinking.
Submit this Assignment Document into Canvas for grading.
N3375 Spring 2020
This study source was downloaded by 100000782945284 from CourseHero.com on 03-12-2022 10:11:26 GMT -06:00
https://www.coursehero.com/file/71966649/Module-3-peer-reviewdocx/
Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org)
Purchase answer to see full
attachment
Recent Comments